IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 COCP No.638 of 2026 Date of decision: March 30th, 2026 Shish Ram and another .....Petitioners Versus Sumita Mishra and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Puneet Jindal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Malvi Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Raj Pratap Singh Brar, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that in pursuance of the order dated 08.09.2025, the Financial Commissioner Revenue and Additional Chief Secretary to Government Haryana, Revenue and Disaster Management Department has passed a speaking order dated 27.03.2026 and a copy of the same is annexed as Annexure R-1 along with the affidavit/compliance report. 2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the order dated 27.03.2026 is against law and the petitioners are aggrieved of the said order and has submitted that although the contempt petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioners to challenge the order dated 27.03.2026 in accordance with law. 3. Disposed of with the said liberty. March 30th, 2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.03.30 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh