Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8093 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA SINGH @ BAGGI S/O SHRI CHHINDAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7259/2026 · 2026-05-21

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:21475] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6310/2026 Dhanna Singh @ Dhani @ Langda S/o Shri Ratansingh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Futaki Police Station Sikri District Deeg (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7259/2026 Rajendra Singh @ Baggi S/o Shri Chhindar Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Mubarikpur, Police Station Naugava, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Mr. Gurvindra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 21/05/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.83/2026 registered at Police Station NEB, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section 303(2) of BNS. [2026:RJ-JP:21475] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6310/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the offences alleged against the accused- petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused- petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, charge-sheet has already been submitted, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, charge-sheet has already been submitted, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Dhanna Singh @ Dhani @ Langda S/o Shri Ratansingh and 2. Rajendra Singh @ Baggi S/o Shri Chhindar Singh, in connection with FIR No.83/2026 registered at Police Station NEB, District Alwar, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The [2026:RJ-JP:21475] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6310/2026] learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. The accused-petitioners are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioners on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. 8. The accused-petitioners are also directed to submit their present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within a period of 7 days from his release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioners changes their address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned Trial Court. In case of any breach to the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/34-35