Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 80903 (MAD)

R.VISHALATCHI v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/49794/2025 · 2026-01-02

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 49794 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 49794 of 2025 R.Vishalatchi Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector District Collector Office, Salem. 2.The District Revenue Officer Subramanianagar, Suramangalam, Salem. 3.The District Treasury Officer Salem 4.Hemalatha Respondent(s) PRAYER;This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd Respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 23.06.2025 and further direct the 1st Respondent to release the death benefits of her son namely Senthilkumar, served as a Head Assistant in RDO Office at Salem District within a stipulated time period fixed by this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): M/s. N.Suresh Babu For Respondent: Mr.S.Balamurugan, GA RR1 to 3 ORDER This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd Respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 23.06.2025 and further direct the 1st Respondent to release the death benefits of her son namely https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 49794 of 2025 Senthilkumar, served as a Head Assistant in RDO Office at Salem District within a stipulated time period fixed by this Honble Court. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner's son died while he was in service. The 4th respondent daughter in law is no willing to give any share in the death benefits of her son. Hence, the petitioner made several representations to either order maintenance or disburse the death benefits of her son to the petitioner. No action has been taken. Hence, the present writ petition. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court may direct the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioners representation within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court. 4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that the representation will be considered and orders will be passed within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court. 5. Heard the learned counsel for both side and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the limited request sought for by the petitioner, this court directs the first respondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 49794 of 2025 to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 23.06.2025 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 02-01-2026 rli Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The District Collector District Collector Office, Salem. 2.The District Revenue Officer Subramanianagar, Suramangalam, Salem. 3.The District Treasury Officer Salem https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 49794 of 2025 M.DHANDAPANI J. rli WP No. 49794 of 2025 02-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis