Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8089 (RAJ)

KAPOOR CHAND VERMA S/O LATE SHRI NAND RAM v. SHRI GAURAV DWIVEDI

CCP/1114/2025 · 2026-05-21

Anand Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:21602] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1114/2025 Kapoor Chand Verma S/o Late Shri Nand Ram, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of 246, Devraj Nagar - Iind, Madrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur - 302029 (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Gaurav Dwivedi, Chief Executive Officer, Ministry Of Information And Broadcasting, Government Of India, Prasar Bharati Secretariat, 2Nd Floor, Pti Building, Sansad Marg, New Delhi - 110001 2. K. Satish Nambudiripad, Director General, Doordarshan Mahanideshalaya, Doordarshan Bhawan, Coppernikas Marg, New Delhi - 110001. 3. Shri Satish Depal, Deputy Director General (Hod), Doordarshan Kendra, Jhalana Dungari, Jaipur - 302004. 4. Smt. Manju Meena, Deputy Director (News), Doordarshan Kendra, Jhalana Dungari, Jaipur - 302004. 5. Mr. Murari Gupta, Assistant Director (News), News Section, Doordarshan Kendra, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. V. P. Mathur, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 21/05/2026 1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents- contemnors, at the outset, submitted that in compliance of order dated 16.05.2019, the placement agency has issued order dated 30.04.2026, whereby the petitioner was directed to join and accordingly the petitioner has joined on 01.05.2026. [2026:RJ-JP:21602] (2 of 2) [CCP-1114/2025] 2. Learned counsel submits that thus, substantive compliance has already been made by the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, although, does not dispute that the petitioner has joined pursuant to order dated 30.04.2026, yet he submits that such joining is subject to decision of this writ petition and the petitioner has joined in compliance of order dated 01.05.2026 passed by this Court. 4. In view of above as well as in the light of the fact that the petitioner has already joined, at this stage no deliberate and willful disobedience has emerged, hence, the contempt petition filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed. 5. Notices stand discharged. 6. However, dismissal of the contempt petition would not prejudice the rights of the petitioner in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4446/2019. (ANAND SHARMA),J 94/Jatin