[2026:RJ-JP:21597] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 548/2025 Brijrani Saini D/o Shri Brijmohan Saini, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Near Aradhna School, Sanjay Nagar, Bharatpur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Mr. Dr. Jogaram, I.a.s. Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayat Raj Department, Panchayati Raj, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Mr. Ashish Modi, I.a.s. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. Mr. Salunkhe Gaurav Ravindra, Ceo, Zila Parishad, Alwar. 4. State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Panchayati Raj, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishvash Saini, Adv. for Mr. M. S. Raghav, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 21/05/2026 1. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of respondents-contemnors submits that vide order dated 23.02.2026, after recording the statement that compliance of order dated 25.10.2024 has already been made, contempt petition was permitted to be withdrawn albeit with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same. 2. Learned counsel submits that the respondents- contemnors were under bonafide impression that the contempt [2026:RJ-JP:21597] (2 of 2) [CCP-548/2025] petition has been dismissed on account of being withdrawn by the petitioner. 3. Thereafter, an application was moved by the petitioner without giving any information to the respondents-contemnors and vide order dated 09.04.2026, without issuing any notice to the respondents-contemnors, the contempt petition was restored at its original number. 4. Learned counsel submits that ignoring the orders dated 23.02.2026 and 09.04.2026 passed by this Court, Registry has wrongly reported that the bailable warrants earlier issued in compliance of order dated 19.01.2026 remain unexecuted. 5. Learned counsel submits that only on account of incorrect report made by the Registry, order dated 16.05.2026 was passed by this Court directing the respondents-contemnors No.1 to 3 to remain personally present before this Court. Respondents-contemnors are accordingly personally present before this Court. 6. Learned counsel submits that in compliance of order passed by the writ Court, appointment has already been given to the petitioner and he has also joined on 05.05.2026. 7. In view of above statement, which has not been controverted by learned counsel for the petitioner, this contempt petition filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed as no deliberate and willful non compliance of order passed by this Court. 8. Notices stand discharged. (ANAND SHARMA),J 91/Jatin