RAGHAV YOGESH HEDA THR POA YOGESH HEDA AND ORS. v. YUSUF MAHAMMAD KAPSE SINCE DEC. THR. LRS. AND ORS.
IA/1409/2026 · 2026-09-10
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8088 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8088 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
40-IA-1409-2026 (C).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1409 OF 2026 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 476 OF 2008 Raghav Yogesh Heda And Ors. … Applicants In the matter between :- Kisan Mohanlal Heda (Since deceased) Through LRs 1(a) Smt. Gitabai Shrikisan Heda & Ors. … Applicants Versus. Yusuf Mahammad Kapse (Since Deceased) Through LRs A. Smt. Shantabai Yusuf Kapse & Ors. … Respondents ----- Mr. S.C. Mangle a/w. Mr. Ashitosh S. Jambilkar i/b. Mr. C.G. Gavnekar for the Applicants. Mr. Gajraj A. Mali i/b. Mr. Chetan G. Patil for the Respondent Nos.1B & 1C. ------- Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. Date : 10th September 2026. PER COURT :
1. Heard Mr. S. C. Mangle, learned Advocate for the Applicants and Mr. Mali, learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1B & 1C. osk 1 of
3
40-IA-1409-2026 (C).docx
2. By this Interim Application, the Applicants have sought the following substantive relief:
“a) The applicants be permitted to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title of the Revision application by substituting the names of the present Applicants No 1 and 2 in place of the original applicants number 1A to 1G. b) The applicants be further permitted to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title of the revision application by substituting the name present applicant number 3 in place of original applicant number 5A. c) For such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Commission deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
3. Mr. S. C. Mangle, learned Advocate for the Applicants, submits that the Applicants have stated the purpose of substitution in paragraphs 4 and 7 of the Application. 4. Mr. Gajraj A. Mali learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1B & 1C, states that he has no objection to allowing this Application and to the grant of the reliefs prayed for by the Applicants in paragraphs 11(a) and 11(b) of this Application. 5. In view of the no-objection given by Mr. Gajraj A. Mali, learned osk 2 of
3
40-IA-1409-2026 (C).docx Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1B & 1C, this Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). The Applicants are permitted to amend the cause title of the Civil Revision Application No. 476 of 2008 by substituting the names of Applicant Nos.
1 & 2 in place of the original Applicant Nos. 1(a) to 1(g). Similarly, the Applicants are permitted to amend the cause title by substituting the name of Applicant No. 3 in place of the original Applicant No. 5A. 6. Mr. S. C. Mangle, learned Advocate for the Applicants, requests permission to carry out the amendment forthwith. Permission granted. The amendment be carried out forthwith. 7. Mr. S. C. Mangle, learned Advocate for the Applicants, submits that Advocate Mr. C. G. Gavnekar has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the Applicants, who are now substituted pursuant to the reliefs in this Application and that he appears for all the Applicants alongwith Advocate Mr. C. G. Gavnekar
8. Interim Application No. 1409 of 2026 is disposed of. [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] osk 3 of
3 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2026.09.11 11:47:55 +0530