Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8087 (UTT)

NEHA BHAKHDA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/416/2023 · 2026-07-14

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010076792023 2026:UHC:5765 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/416/2023 Neha Bhakhda --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Tushar Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the applicant.. 2. Mr. Rakesh Joshi, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Manoj Bhatt, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Nalin Saun, learned counsel for complainant. 4. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, would submit that the present petition has become infructuous. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant does not dispute the aforesaid submissions. 6. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail is dismissed as infructuous. 7. No order as to costs. (Alok Mahra, J.) 14-07-2026 mamta MAMTA RANI Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46f244f3e584af1449 e430ef900bf09a6d67ebbd642671329b, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1d9cabfd54852c9 e68911ca8b66dd26690a191648ab5d8dd004 ef0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2026.07.14 17:20:21 +05'30'