Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8087 (AP)

Nakka Srivannarayana v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

CRLRC/395/2021 · 2026-08-17

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010216632021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE 18th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 395/2021 Between: 1. NAKKA SRIVANNARAYANA, S/O JAMALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, UPPARA BY CASTE, R/O D.NO.3-1-74/3, AMBEDKAR ROAD, GANGARAJU QUARRY, KABELA CENTRE, VIDYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. NAKKA JAYAMMA, W/O JAMALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, UPPARA BY CASTE, R/O KABELA CENTRE, GANGARAJU QUARRY, VIDYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. NAKKA JAMALAIAH, S/O GOPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, UPPARA BY CASTE, R/O KABELA CENTRE, GANGARAJU QUARRY, VIDYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI. THROUGH, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHAVANIPURAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. TADISETTI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O LEELAPATHI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, UPPARA BY CASTE, R/O D.NO. 3-1-74/3, AMBEDKAR ROAD, GANGARAJU QUARRY, KABELA CENTRE, VIDYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 2 1. CHANDRA SEKHAR ILAPAKURTI 2. M V V R SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Petitioners and Respondent No.2 are present. Sri D.Dorababu, learned Counsel is appointed as learned Mediator in this case and he has submitted mediator’s report. In view of the mediator’s report, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada, in S.C.No.65 of 2018, dated 26.03.2021, is set aside, as a result, the Petitioners are acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 18.08.2026 VTS