Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 80857 (MAD)

K.PUSHPAKUMARI v. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

WP/49542/2025 · 2026-01-02

M Dhandapani

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 49542 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 49542 of 2025 AND WMP NO. 55377 OF 2025 1. K.Pushpakumari 2.P. Kavitha 3.Suresh Wilson 4.K.Devan 5.J. Sarashwathi 6.M. John Jeya Singh 7.K. Muniyasami 8.S. Selva Suresh Britto 9.R. Joie 10.N. Sharlet 11.N. Mariyammal 12.S. Gomathi Petitioner(s) Vs The Additional Director General of Police Armed Police, Kilpauk Chennai 600 010 Respondent(s) PRAYER;This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representations dated 24.11.2025 and 01.12.2025 of the petitioners for the purpose of releasing the ensuing seniority list in the post of inspector of police within time frame. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 49542 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.Ravi Ananth Padmanaban, Sr.C. for M/s.S.Dayanand For Respondent: Mr.K.Surendran, AGP ORDER This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the representations dated 24.11.2025 and 01.12.2025 of the petitioners for the purpose of releasing the ensuing seniority list in the post of inspector of police within time frame. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the the petitioners made representations to the respondent requesting to re-arrange their seniority in the post of Inspector of Police as per selection process marks as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme court while promoting them from the post of Sub Inspector to the Inspector of Police and the same is not considered. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court may direct the respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioners representations strictly in terms of the order in Civil Appeal W.O.Nos.6305 - 06 of 2025 dated 01.05.2025 within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court. 4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the representations will be considered and orders will https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 49542 of 2025 be passed within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court. 5. Heard the learned counsel for both side and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the limited request sought for by the petitioners, this court directs the respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioners representations dated 24.11.2025 and 01.12.2025 strictly in terms of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal W.O.Nos.6305 - 06 of 2025 dated 01.05.2025 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 02-01-2026 rli Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To The Additional Director General Of Police Armed Police, Kilpauk Chennai 600 010 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 49542 of 2025 M.DHANDAPANI J. rli WP No. 49542 of 2025 02.01.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 49542 of 2025 02-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis