[2026:RJ-JP:21885] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 6761/2026 1. Shishram S/o Palaram, Age About 65 Years, R/o Shivnagar Badau Police Station Khetri Nagar, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) (Accused Petitioner At Present Confined In Jail Jhunjhunu) 2. Omprakash Alias Prakash S/o Palaram, Age About 48 Years, R/o Shivnagar Badau Police Station Khetri Nagar, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) (Accused Petitioner At Present Confined In Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Omveer Singh Saini HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 22/05/2026 1. The instant 2nd bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 25/2025 registered at Police Station Khetri Nagar, District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 329(3) & 110 of B.N.S., 2023, in which charge- sheet has been submitted under Sections 110, 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 126(2), 191(2), 191(3) and 352 of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the [2026:RJ-JP:21885] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6761/2026] accused-petitioners are in custody since long. He further submits that the co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove and submits that there is one criminal case is pending under Section 341, 323, 447, 427 and 34 of IPC. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that charge-sheet against the accused-petitioners have already been filed; that the accused- petitioners are in custody since 25.02.2026; that the co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail namely, Vinod Devi, Suvita Devi, Sushila Devi & Anita Devi vide order dated 17.04.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2605/2026 and namely Manish Alias Manesh and Rakesh Bagadiya have also been enlarged on bail vide order dated 22.01.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 237/2026; that injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant 2nd bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners (1) Shishram S/o Palaram, (2) Omprakash Alias Prakash S/o [2026:RJ-JP:21885] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6761/2026] Palaram are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence once in a month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/32