Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8079 (ORI)

BHUBANESWAR KAR v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/12105/2026 · 2026-05-01

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.12105 of 2026 Bhubaneswar Kar …. Petitioner Ms. B.K. Pattnaik, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 01.05.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “ It is therefore prayed that the Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to admit the case and call for the records and after hearing both the parties pas the following reliefs: i) To direct the Opp.parties to release the final pension, gratuity and commuted value of pension of the petitioner with 18% interest. ii) To direct the Opposite Parties to release his differential arrear salary of the petitioner for his promotional post such as Sr.Driver and head driver. iii) To pass such other order/orders as would be deemed fit and proper. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievance, Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.3 vide Annexure-7 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.3 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-7 within a period of three (3) months in accordance with law from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat