HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33352 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Subhash Singh Yadav, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 1A. Learned counsel for the applicant hands up the supplementary affidavit enclosing the document in support of bail application, the same is taken on record. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant/ accused- Dinesh Yadav to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 247 of 2026, under Sections 318(4), 308(5), 351(3), 352 BNS, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Ghazipur, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in the FIR dated 13.04.2026 lodged for the alleged incident between 04.07.2024 to 21.08.2024 with the allegation that the accused/applicant has taken nearly Rs. 17 Lakhs from the informant for showing her land for sale. It is the contention of learned counsel that the accused/applicant and informant are relatives and after the death of informant's husband, the accused/applicant started residing with the informant. It is due to some dispute that the FIR has lodged against him. Learned counsel further submits that the bank statement does not show deposit of money as is stated by the informant. The charge sheet is submitted. The accused/applicant has no criminal history. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 16.05.2026. He seeks to be enlarged on bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Subhash Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dinesh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Learned A.G.A. for State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering the prima facie no transaction between the parties reflected from the bank account as is submitted by the accused/applicant, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 18, 2026 Abhishek Sri. BAIL No. 33352 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad