SMT. POOJA ROY URF FIROJA BIBI D/O NIZAMUDDIN W/O MAMTAZ MOLI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7456/2026 · 2026-05-22
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8074 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8074 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:21771] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7456/2026 Smt. Pooja Roy Urf Firoja Bibi D/o Nizamuddin W/o Mamtaz Moli, Aged About 30 Years, At Present C/o Naresh Roy, Resident Of Chapudiya, Police Station Titagarh, District Utar, 24 Pargana, West Bangal, At Present Resident Of Shaspur Pachippar Kalna M Vardhman West Bangal. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Women Reformatory Ajmer) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aslam S. Khan Mr. Abdul Aziz Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 22/05/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.78/2026 registered at Police Station Mangaliawas, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is a lady aged about 30 years and is facing allegations that in consideration of an amount of Rs. 1,50,000/-, she has performed the marriage with the complainant Sunil and started to reside as husband and wife. It is submitted that when the petitioner no longer wished to
[2026:RJ-JP:21771] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7456/2026] continue residing with the complainant, the complainant lodged the present FIR on false and concocted grounds. It is further submitted that the petitioner was arrested from the house of the complainant. Petitioner is behind the bars since 27.04.2026 without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, in view of the above factual matrix no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Smt. Pooja Roy Urf Firoja Bibi D/o Nizamuddin W/o Mamtaz Moli, be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/68