Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8074 (AP)

Vajragiri Veeraiah, v. Palle Ramakrishna Reddy

CRP/518/2021 · 2026-08-04

B Krishna Mohan

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010143172021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 518/2021 Between: 1. VAJRAGIRI VEERAIAH,, S/O. KOTAIAH, HINDU, AGED 51 YEARS, FOREST BEAT OFFICER, WORKING AT TRIPURARAM VILLAGE, NAKIREKALLU MANDAL, R/O. S.T. COLONY, NAKIREKALLU V AND M, GUNTURDISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PALLE RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, , S/o. Show Reddy, Aged about 37 years, Cultivation, R/o. Dharmavaram Village, Dugi Mandal, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the Order dated 23.11.2020 made in EP.No.43/2020 in O.S. No. 99/2015, on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Gurajala, in attaching the salary of the petitioner under Order XXI Rule 48 CPC while ordering notice on 21.12.2020 itself the above named petitioner humbly begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the attachment order Dt. 23.11.2020 made in EP No. 43/2020 in O.S. No. 99/2015 on the file of the Court of The Senior Civil Judge, Gurajala pending disposal of CRP Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V S K RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO 2 The Court made the following Order: No representation for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents reported that, the petitioner died and though the same information was furnished, no steps have been taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Accordingly, the C.R.P. is dismissed as abated. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 05.08.2026 NNN