Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 80726 (MAD)

D.Jegan v. The District Revenue officer

WP/50360/2025 · 2026-01-05

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 50360 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP NO. 50360 OF 2025 1. D.Jegan Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Revenue officer Office at District Collectorate, Tiruvannamalai 2.The district collector District Collectorate, Tiruvannamalai 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruvannamalai 4.V.Mayakannan Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 21.04.2025 for issuance of joint patta pertaining to the property situated in survey number Survey No. 6/3 Melpasar Village, Mothakkal post, Thandrampattu Taluk Tiruvannamalai District measuring 30 cents For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Anaimuthuraja For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For R1 To R3 R4 – Dispensed with ORDER This writ petition has been filed, seeking for a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 21.04.2025, seeking for issuance of joint patta for the property morefully described in the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50360 of 2025 prayer to this writ petition within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner contends that erroneously patta has been issued for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition in the name of the fourth respondent alone. Therefore, the petitioner had given a representation on 21.04.2025, seeking for cancellation of patta standing in the name of the fourth respondent and for issuance of joint patta which includes the name of the petitioner as well. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed. 3. Mr. R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse orders are passed against the fourth respondent, notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with by this Court. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation dated 21.04.2025 is considered on merits and in accordance with law after hearing the objections of the fourth respondent as well as any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation dated 21.04.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50360 of 2025 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the third respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 21.04.2025, seeking for cancellation of patta standing in the name of the fourth respondent and for issuance of joint patta which includes the name of the petitioner for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after hearing the objections of the fourth respondent as well as any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 05-01-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District Revenue officer Office at District Collectorate, Tiruvannamalai 2.The district collector District Collectorate, Tiruvannamalai 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruvannamalai https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50360 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP NO. 50360 OF 2025 05-01-2026 (2/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis