Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8072 (RAJ)

PRAHLAD S/O SHRI BHAIRU LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6924/2026 · 2026-05-25

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:22116] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6924/2026 Prahlad S/o Shri Bhairu Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Badagaav @ Kalmanda, Police Station Diggi, District Tonk (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Malpura) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena Mr. Prem Prakash Bairwa Mr. Gaurav Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 25/05/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.58/2026 registered at Police Station Diggi, District Tonk for offences under Sections 189(2), 121(1), 132, 303(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 4 and 21 of MMDR Act, 1957. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegations levelled against the present petitioner is that he obstructed the public servants while they were discharging their official. Petitioner is behind the bars since 11.04.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served [2026:RJ-JP:22116] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6924/2026] by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Prahlad S/o Shri Bhairu Lal, shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before the Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/90