[2026:RJ-JP:21887] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 814/2026 1. Kumkum Meena D/o Ratan Lal Meena W/o Ravi Meena, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Lotana, Padasoli, Jaipur, Presently R/o Pilot Nagar, Gumanpura Colony, Near Surya Mandir, Agra Road, Dausa, Ward No. 34, Dausa (Rural), District Dausa. 2. Ravi Meena S/o Mahaveer Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Pilot Nagar, Gumanpura Colony, Near Surya Mandir, Agra Road, Dausa, Ward No. 34, Dausa (Rural), District Dausa. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Superintendent Of Police, Dausa. 3. Sho, Police Station Sadar Dausa, District Dausa. 4. Ratanlal Meena S/o Shri Kishan Lal, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Lotana Ki Dhani, Parasoli, Jaipur. 5. Dinesh Chand S/o Shri Kishan Lal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Lotana Ki Dhani, Parasoli, Jaipur. 6. Moti S/o Kishanlal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Lotana Ki Dhani, Parasoli, Jaipur. 7. Khelraj S/o Ratanlal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Lotana Ki Dhani, Parasoli, Jaipur. 8. Saksham S/o Ratanlal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Lotana Ki Dhani, Parasoli, Jaipur. 9. Kamal S/o Kalu, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Lotana Ki Dhani, Parasoli, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kartar Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 22/05/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. [2026:RJ-JP:21887] (2 of 3) [CRLW-814/2026] 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.4 to 9 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 07.04.2026 at Arya Samaj Sansthan 201-202 Second Floor Apex Towar Lal Kothi Tonk Road Jaipur-302015. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 4 to 9 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they have prayed for protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the same. 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signature have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. [2026:RJ-JP:21887] (3 of 3) [CRLW-814/2026] 9. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Anu/221