1 2026:CGHC:2353 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9518 of 2023 1 - Neeraj Kumar Pandey S/o Shri Ramendra Nath Pandey Aged About 42 Years Working On The Post Of Constable, Presently Posted At Police Station- Darmia,, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2 - Anjela Minj Wd/o Late Vikram Kujur Aged About 47 Years Working On The Post Of Constable, Police Station- Batouli,, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Home (Police), Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, Post Office- Rakhi,, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police Police Headquarter Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Inspector General Of Police Surguja Rang, Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintendent Of Police Surguja, Ambikapur,, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 5 - Rajeev Kumar Kujur Head Constable Of Police Batch No. 270, Posted At Ambikapur,, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 6 - Mukesh Kumar Gupta Head Constable Of Police Batch No. 377, Posted At Ambikapur,, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 7 - Manoj Kumar Head Constable Of Police Batch No. 216, Posted At Ambikapur,, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.01.14 18:42:43 +0530 2 8 - Dilip Bhagat Head Constable Of Police Batch No. 282, Posted At Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 9 - Bhagiya Chand Khalkho Head Constable Of Police Batch No. 248, Posted At Ambikapur,, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : None For State : Mr. Arpit Agrawal, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 14.01.2026 1 Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioners is not present nor any representation made on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition on repeated calls and it appears that the petitioners has lost interest in pursuing the matter, as such this Court has left with no other option, but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 2 Mr. Arpit Agrawal, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing on behalf of the State/respondents No.1 to 4, is present. 3 Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh