Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8065 (PNJ)

MANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/3860/2026 · 2026-04-07

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-3860-202 IN THE 118 MANDEEP KAU STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON Present: Mr. MANISHA BAT 1. The Constitution of I official responden at the hands of re dated 02.04.2026 2. It is are major. They threats have even to kill her. She ha Apprehending da 02.04.2026 to th consideration and 2026 (O&M) (1) N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH P KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus PUNJAB AND ORS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANISH **** Mr. Chahit Bansal, Advocate for the BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been file n of India seeking issuance of a wr pondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life s of respondents No.4 and 5 and take .2026 (Annexure P-5). It is submitted by the learned couns They are in love. Their parents are e even been extended to petitioner No She has left her house and has started l ing danger to their lives and liberty, to the respondent No.2 but the sa on and hence, the present petition. NJAB AND HARYANA GARH CRWP-3860-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 ...Petitioners ...Respondents ANISHA BATRA for the petitioners. en filed under Article 226 of the a writ of mandamus directing the the life and liberty of the petitioners d take action on their representation counsel for the petitioners that they ts are against their relationship and er No.1 by her parents and relatives tarted living with the petitioner No.2. berty, they sent representation dated e same has not been taken into 2026 ners f the the ners ation they and tives o.2. ated into AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.07 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-3860-202 3. Notic 4. Ms. behalf of respon directed to supply 5. I hav State counsel an relationship as w veracity of the a sanctity of relatio a direction to the look into the m (Annexure P-5) in genuine threat to 6. A c 02.04.2026 (Anne do the needful exp 7. It is petitioners from le 07.04.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAG respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage supply the copy of the petition to her. I have heard learned counsel for the sel and without going into the q as well as without entering upon the averments made in the petition relationship or age of the petitioners, t to the respondent No.2-Senior Superin the matter and dispose of the rep ) in accordance with law and also eat to life and liberty of the petitioners A copy of this order along with (Annexure P-5) be sent to responden ful expeditiously. It is made clear that this order sha from legal action for violation of law, i (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes    DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on stage. The petitioners’ counsel is o her. for the petitioners as well as learned the question of legality of their upon an exercise to evaluate the tion and also with regard to the ners, this petition is disposed of with uperintendent of Police, Bathinda to e representation dated 02.04.2026 d also to take necessary step, if any, ioners is found. th copy of representation dated ondent No.2, so as to enable him to er shall not be taken to protect the f law, if any, committed by them. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No  e on el is rned their the the with to 2026 any, ated m to t the AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.07 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.