Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:3221
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2992 of 2019 Dr. (Smt) Daize Kujur W/o Shri Rajesh Prakash Ekka Aged About 43 Years Presently Working As Assistant Professor (Hindi), Government Minimata Girls College, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Commissioner Directorate Of Higher Education, Block - C, 3rd Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
3. Principal Government College, Dipika, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
4. Principal Government Minimata Girls College, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner
: Mr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Anil Pandey, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 20.01
.2026
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief :- 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 27.03.2019 (Annexure P/1) passed by the respondent no.3, Government College, Dipika on account of loss of books during the service tenure of the petitioner in the interest of justice. SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.01.20 16:38:29 +0530
2 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 03.04.2019 (Annexure P-6) in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief or relief(s) which this Hon'ble Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted.
2. Mr. Sudeep Agrawal would submit that at the relevant time, the petitioner was posted to the post of Assistant Professor (Hindi) in Government College, Dipika, District Korba. She was transferred vide order dated 01.10.2018 from Government College, Dipika, Korba to Minimata Girls College, Korba. He would submit that the petitioner was directed to handover the charge of Library to the respondent No. 3. It is contended that after transfer, Last Pay Certificate (LPC) was not transferred to the said institution and an order of recovery was issued vide order dated 27.03.2019 by the respondent No. 3 without affording any opportunity of hearing. He would submit that during the pendency of this petition LPC has been issued; therefore, the petitioner would not press relief in this regard. He would submit that with regard to recovery, no opportunity of hearing was afforded; therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondent authorities to take action, if any, after affording due opportunity of hearing.
3. Mr. Anil Pandey, Government Advocate appearing for the State would oppose.
4. Taking into consideration the prayer made by Mr. Agrawal, this petition is
disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities, if any recovery proceeding, pursuant to letter dated 27.03.2019 (Annexure P/1), is initiated against the petitioner, sufficient opportunity would be afforded to the petitioner.
3
5. With the aforesaid observation(s), the instant petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge $iddhant