IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 12336 of 2026 Tanay Kumar Nandi …. Petitioner Mr. L.K. Mohanty, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 01.05.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. Even though the present Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order dtd.11.03.2026 so passed by Opposite Party No.2 under Annexure-10, but in course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that in terms of the order passed under Annexure-10 Opposite Party No.4 is not releasing the benefit as due and admissible to the Petitioner. 4. Mr. A. Tripathy, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State on the other hand contended that since Collector-Opposite Party No.2 has passed an order under Annexure-10 and if the same is not being carried out by Opposite Party No.4 appropriate remedy p. 2 p. 2 before the Petitioner is to move Opposite Party No.2 seeking compliance of the order under Annexure-10. 5. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submissions made, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition permits the Petitioner to move Opposite Party No.2 for compliance of the order passed by him on 11.03.2026 under Annexure-10. 6. It is observed that if any such application will be filed within a period of two (2) weeks hence, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of such application. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.2 be communicated to the Petitioner. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat