IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 274 of 2026 Date of Decision: 01.04.2026 Amita ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3-State. Mr. Vishwajeet Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4 – H.P. Rajya Chayan Aayog, Hamirpur. Vivek Singh Thakur,Judge (oral) Learned counsel for respondent No. 4 – H.P. Rajya Chayan Aayog, Hamirpur, in sequel to the instructions received from respondents No. 1 to 3 – State, has placed on record instructions issued under the signatures of Secretary H.P. Rajya Chayan Aayog, Hamirpur, along with a copy of the corrigendum dated 31.03.2026 with respect to Advertisement No. 07/2026 dated 06.12.2025, with the submission that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has endorsed the submission that the grievance of the petitioner, in view of the ____________ subsequent act, stands redressed and, therefore, petitioner does not press this petition. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of being not pressed along with pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, in the same terms. (Vivek Singh Thakur) (Judge) (Ranjan Sharma) (Judge) 01st April, 2026 (Shamsh Tabrez) ____________