Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8047 (HP)

JAI PARKASH v. NIPUN JINDAL AND ANR

COPC/482/2026 · 2026-05-11

Romesh Verma

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 482 of 2026 Date of decision : 11.05.2026 Jai Parkash ...Petitioner. Versus Nipun Jindal & anr. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar & Rakesh Kumar Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate. __________________________________________ Romesh Verma, Judge (oral) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner for non-compliance of the judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No. 2172 of 2025, dated 05.03.2025. 2. The Court had issued notice on 8th May, 2026. 3. Today learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record communication dated 24.11.2025 addressed by Financial Advisor & C.A.O Himachal Road Transport Corporation Shimla, to the petitioner whereby it has been stated that due and admissible dearness/Interim Relief has already been settled/considered and no such arrear for the year 2016 to 30.09.2018 is due, as per BOD decision in this regard, as he has retired on 31.03.2021 on attaining the age of superannuation. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Consequently, in view of above nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present petition, as such, the same is ordered to be closed. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to challenge the said communication before the competent court of law. Liberty granted. ‘ Accordingly the petition is disposed off. (Romesh Verma) May 11, 2026 Judge (Veena)