Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 80456 (MAD)

GOTHANDAPANI v. THE STATE OF TAMILNADU

WP/3521/2026 · 2026-02-26

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No.3521 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26.02.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 3521 of 2026 Gothandapani Petitioner Vs 1.The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The District Collector Villupuram District Villupuram. 3.The District Revenue Officer Villupuram District Villupuram. 4.The Tahsildar Marakkanam Taluka, Villupuram District. 5.Rajakannu 6.Ambikapathy 7.Amsa 8.Manoharan 9.Kalappan 10.Aarumugam 11.Govindasamy Respondents p. 2 WP No.3521 of 2026 Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to consider the representation dated 10.10.2025 and direct the respondents to remove all illegal encroachments made by respondent 5 to 11 in the government odai Poramboke land situated between Survey Nos.81,82,84,85, and 124 of Kandadu Village, Marakkanam Taluk Villupuram District, and to restore the odai Poramboke to its Original condition with reference to the FMB Sketch and other revenue records to identify and demarcate the encroached portions. For Petitioner : Mr. S.Vellidoss For Respondents : Mr. E.Vijay Anand Additional Government Pleader For R1 To R4. ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) In response to the allegation of encroachment, learned State Counsel, upon instructions, refers to the status report filed by the fourth respondent and submits that survey was conducted and many encroachments have been found and action has been initiated. He further submits that even the petitioner has been found to be an encroacher. p. 3 WP No.3521 of 2026 2. Taking into consideration that action has already been initiated and further taking into consideration that the petitioner himself is found to be an encroacher, we are not inclined to proceed further. 3. The writ petition stands closed. There will be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 26.02.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No tar 1.The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The District Collector Villupuram District Villupuram. 3.The District Revenue Officer Villupuram District Villupuram. 4.The Tahsildar Marakkanam Taluka, Villupuram District. p. 4 WP No.3521 of 2026 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN , J. (tar) WP No. 3521 of 2026 26.02.2026