Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 80441 (MAD)

Tata Capital Lt d v. PRABU S

Arb Appln/1692/2025 · 2026-02-02

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/4 Arb Appln No. 1692 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Arb Appln No. 1692 of 2025 Tata Capital Ltd By its Manager & Legal Remedial Ramkumar Sathyamoorthy Having its office at 1st Floor, Contennial Square, 6A , Dr Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024. Applicant(s) Vs Prabu S Respondent(s) PRAYER Petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to pass an order Appointing Mr.Abish DJ, employed as employee currently designated as Legal Manager in the Applicant company having his office First Floor, Centennial Square, Dr.Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 024 as Receiver to seize and deliver the asset TOYOTA FORTUNER 2 OL 2WDMTB bearing Engine IKDU783606 Chassis No.MBJ11JV6104044756 Reg.No.TN 12 J 5254 situated at No.3 Ebinesar Street, Pallikaranai Post, Land Mark - Near Royal Furniture, Kancheepuram, 600 100 Tamil Nadu. or wherever it is found more fully described hereunder, with police aid or break open the premises from wherever found and handover the same to the applicant. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4 Arb Appln No. 1692 of 2025 For Appellant(s): Mr.N.K.Vanan ORDER This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, [for brevity 'the Act'] for appointment of a receiver to seize and deliver the vehicle from the respondent to the applicant, if necessary, with police protection and by breaking open the premises. 2. Heard Mr.D.Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for applicant and carefully perused the materials available on record. 3. When the matter came up for hearing on 16.12.2025, this Court ordered notice to the respondent. 4. The private notice sent to the respondent has been served and the affidavit of service has also been filed. There is no representation for the respondent either in person or through counsel. Hence, the apprehension raised on the side of the applicant that the respondent is trying to secret the vehicle is prima facie established. 5. In view of the above, Mr.Abish DJ, Legal Manager, is appointed as the Court receiver and the Court receiver is permitted to seize the vehicle from https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4 Arb Appln No. 1692 of 2025 the respondent or wherever it is found and by breaking open the premises, if required with police assistance. 6. This application stands disposed of in the above terms. 02-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ssr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4 Arb Appln No. 1692 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. ssr Arb Appln No. 1692 of 2025 02-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis