Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8044 (ALL)

SANJAY RAGHAV v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/15023/2026 · 2026-09-17

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15023 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Instructions have been placed before this Court by learned Standing Counsel and are taken on record. 2. On the basis of instructions, learned Standing Counsel has stated that the petitioner has been reinstated in service. 3. Copy of the instructions is provided to the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Since the relief has been granted to the petitioner, no further orders are required to be passed in the matter. 5. Accordingly, the petition is consigned to record. September 18, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Ji Mishra, Kaushal Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sanjay Raghav .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad