Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10188 WP No. 18990 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 18990 OF 2024 (GM-AC) BETWEEN:
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INS. CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, RAJ TOWERS S NO.109/6, DOOR NO.2-4-14-CII MOODANIDAMBUR VILLAGE, UDUPI - 576 101, NOW REP. BY THE MANAGER BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED., GOLDEN HEIGHTS 4TH FLOOR, NO.1/2, 59TH C CROSS, 4TH M BLOCK, RAJAJI NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 010 COMPANY REGISTER UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956 …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. A N KRISHNA SWAMY., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
MR. SUDHAKARA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O ANANDA SHETTY
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10188 WP No. 18990 of 2024
R/O NO.2-163, PANJIMAR PADU HOUSE MANCHAKAL, SHIRVA, UDUPI - 574 116
2.
A S JUST RIDE TOURS AND TRAVELS NO.432 A, 9TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, 3RD STAGE, INDIRA NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 038 …RESPONDENTS (R1 IS SERVED )
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER AS PER ANNEXURE-D DATED 01.03.2024 PASSED BY PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, UDUPI ON IA NO.2 FILED UNDER
ORDER VII RULE 11(d) READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC, READ WITH SECTION 166(3) OF MV ACT IN MVC NO.958/2023 AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND HOLD THAT CLAIM PETITION AS PER ANNEXURE-A IS NOT MAINTAINABLE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10188 WP No. 18990 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
This petition is by the Insurer who is called upon to answer a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [for short, 'the Act'] in the claim petition in MVC No.958/2023 on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Udupi [for short, 'the Tribunal']. The petitioner has filed an application under Order VII Rule 11[d] read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 contending that the claim petition cannot be entertained because it is filed beyond six months from the date of accident. The Tribunal, by the impugned
order dated 01.03.2024, has dismissed the petitioner’s application.
The question: whether a claim petition filed beyond six months from the date of the accident can be entertained is pending with the Apex Court in SLP Nos.8412-8413/2023 and similar matters in the writ
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10188 WP No. 18990 of 2024
petition in WP [Civil] No. 166/2024 and connected matters. It remains undisputed that the Apex Court by its interim order dated 16.12.2025 has observed that the pendency of the writ petitions/special leave petitions before it shall not come in the way of the claim petitions being adjudicated by the Tribunals but with the stipulation that judgments shall not be finalized.
This Court is of the considered view that with the afore-stipulation, this petition must be disposed of observing that the Tribunal's impugned order will be subject to the outcome in the pending matters before the Apex Court. With this arrangement, the inquiry into the merits of the claim petition will continue, but the Tribunal will refrain from pronouncing its judgment and award so that the decision on the merit of the claim petition otherwise will be subject to the Apex Court’s decision on the afore question.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10188 WP No. 18990 of 2024
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
NV List No.: 4 Sl No.: 20