Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:12357-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) (DB) No.185 of 2026 (H.B.)
------ Sima Ghosh, W/o of Bimal Kr. Ghosh, Aged about 35 Years, R/O Shridhar Colony No.1, P.O-&P.S-Radhanagar, District-Sahebganj
…. …. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. The Director General of Police, having office Police Head quarter, Dhurwa, P.O-Dhurwa, P.S-Jagarnnathpur, District-Ranchi.
3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Santhal Pargana, Dumka, Office at-Near Blok office Dumka, P.O & P.S-Dumka, District-Dumka.
4. The Superintendent of Police Sahibganj, having office S.P. Office Sahibganj, P.O & P.S-Sahibganj, District-Sahibganj.
5. The Officer In-charge, Radhanagar Police Station, Sahibganj, P.O- Sahibganj, P.S-Radhanagar, District-Sahibganj.
..... .... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahavir Pd. Sinha, Advocate
Mr. Santosh Kr. Jha, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Manish Kumar, Sr. S.C.-II
Mr. Ashwini Bhushan, AC to Sr. SC-II
------
04/Dated: 28.04.2026
1. In pursuant to the order dated 24th April, 2026, the Corpus has been produced by Mrs. Aruna Kumari Toppo, Assistant Sub- Inspector of Police, posted in the Rajmahal Police Station.
2. This Court has asked from the Corpus that whether she is willing to live with Rakesh Baidh to whom she has solemnized marriage.
3. She has stated that she is happily residing in her matrimonial house and has made no complaint whatsoever.
2026:JHHC:12357-DB
2
4. The petitioner, namely, Sima Ghosh along with her husband, namely, Bimal Kumar Ghosh is also present.
5. They have stated before this Court that they are not in a position to say anything in a situation where their daughter has solemnized marriage to Rakesh Baidh.
6. They have also stated that the Corpus since is major now and since she has chosen her life partner, therefore, they are nothing to say.
7. This Court, considering the aforesaid statement, is of the view that instant writ petition needs to be disposed of.
8. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.
9. Pending Interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) 28.04.2026 Rohit/-