Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8033 (AP)

P.Adi Narayanan Rao v. P.Vamsi Chandrika

CRLRC/268/2015 · 2026-08-04

Sunitha Gandham

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010700092015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 268 OF 2015 Between: 1. P.Adi Narayanan Rao, S/O Krishnamurthy, aged about 58 years, Agriculturist, R/O flat No 203, RSR Towers, Bhandari layout, Nizampet, Hyderabad. 2. P.Lalita, W/O P.Adi Narayanan Rao, Aged about 54 years, household, R/0 flat No 203, RSR Towers, Bhandari layout, Nizampet, Hyderabad. 3. M. Harshita, W/O M.Kishore, aged about 30 years, household, R/O 404, Sravani Sadan, Bhandari layout, Nizampet, Hyderabad. 4. M.Kishore,, S/0 Bhaskara Rao aged about 32 years, Business, R/O 404, Sravani Sadan, Bhandari layout, Nizampet, Hyderabad. ...Petitioners AND 1. P Vamsi Chandrika, W/O P.Nitin, Aged about 24 years, private employment, door No 25/352 buttaipet Center, Machilipatnam. 2. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad ...Respondents The Court made the following: HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 268 OF 2015 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is preferred assailing the order passed on 08.01.2015 in Crl.M.P. No.3188 of 2014 in C.C. No.113 of 2014 by the Special Judicial First Class Magistrate for trying Prohibition & Excise Offences, Machilipatnam. 2. As seen from the letter of learned IV Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) FAC Special Judicial First Class Magistrate for trying Prohibition & Excise Offences, Machilipatnam, dated 03.08.2026, the main case in C.C. No.113 of 2014 pending on the file of Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class for trying Prohibition & Excise Offences, Machilipatnam was disposed of on 27.04.2015. 3. In view of the disposal of main case vide judgment dated 27.04.2015, this Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous. 4. In the result, this Criminal Revision case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J 05.08.2026 knl