Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8032 (PNJ)

SHIV CHARANJIT PURI v. UMA SHANKAR GUPTA

COCP/426/2026 · 2026-03-19

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[108] Shiv Chara Uma Shank Developme Mohali. Coram : Present: PANKAJ [1] way of an Rural Deve No.1, in C been suppli [2] off. Howe order in cas [3] disposed of 19.03.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA COCP-426 Date of De Charanjit Puri Shankar Gupta, IAS, Director Rural lopment & Panchayats, SAS Nagar, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Mandeep K. Saajan, Advo Mr. Vikram K. Bishnoi, Advoc for the petitioner. Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, A **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned State Counsel has pro of an affidavit of Shri Uma Shankar G l Development and Panchayats, Pun , in Court today. The same is taken o supplied to learned counsel for the pe In view thereof, the present c However, liberty is granted to the pe r in case the grievance still survives. All pending miscellaneous a ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 426-2026 (O&M) of Decision : 19.03.2026 …Petitioner Versus Rural agar, ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN Advocate with Advocate Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. as produced a compliance report by nkar Gupta, Director, Department of s, Punjab, on behalf of respondent aken on record. A copy thereof has the petitioner. esent contempt petition is disposed the petitioner to assail the speaking eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No rt by nt of dent f has osed king tands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.03.23 12:11 I agree to specified portions of this document