Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8031 (CAL)

MADHURIMA ROY v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/18440/2025 · 2026-02-03

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20/02 2026 AD-01/24 266312 NANDY (CORRECTION) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 18440 of 2025 Madhurima Roy Vs. The Union of India & Ors. Mr. Narayan Debnath, Advocate Ms. B. Ghosh, Advocate …...for the Petitioner Mr. D.N. Maiti, Advocate Mr. A. Santra, Advocate ……for the Respondent No. 6 Mr. Koushik Roy, Advocate Mr. Guddu Singh, Advocate ……for the Union of India 1. This matter has come up in the list at the instance of the petitioner for correction of an order dated 03.02.2026 wherein the writ-petition number has been wrongly typed as ‘18840’ instead of ‘18440’. 2. Office is directed to correct such mistake as pointed out at the relevant portion of the order dated 03.02.2026 without any other alteration. 3. This order may be read conjointly with the order dated 03.02.2026. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) P a g e | 2