Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8030 (KAR)

SMT. G NITYA v. BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE

WP/11778/2019 · 2026-02-11

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8247 WP No. 11778 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 11778 OF 2019 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SMT. G NITYA W/O SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/A NO.01, AMAR NIVAS 2ND MAIN ROAD 7TH CROSS AMARJYOTHI NAGARA VIJAYA NAGAR BANGALORE-560 040 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BINDU U., ADVOCATE) AND: BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N R SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.AMIT DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY AS TO NOT TO INTERFERE IN THE BUSINESS OF THE PETITIONER WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8247 WP No. 11778 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; i. Issue a Writ of mandamus directing the respondent authority as to not to interfere in the business of the petitioner without due process of law. ii. Grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the lease period has expired, rendering the above petition infructuous. 3. Placing the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner on record, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19