DEEPAK KR BASUMATARY AND 2 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
Crl.Pet./135/2026 · 2026-02-25
Mitali Thakuria
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 803 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 803 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010019022026
2026:GAU-AS:2970
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./135/2026 DEEPAK KR BASUMATARY AND 2 ORS.
SON OF MAHAL CHANDRA BASUMATARY, RESIDENT OF SIMLAGURI, SIDLI, KAJALGAON, DISTCHIRANG, ASSAM, PIN-783386.
2: REKHA RAMI BARMAN W/O- SHASHI MOHAN SINGHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGEBARSHANGAON PART-II PSBONGAIGAON DIST- BONGALGAON ASSAM PIN-783380.
3: SUSHILA DEVI NIROLA W/O- KRISHNA PRASAD SHARMA RESIDENT OF VILLAGEDOLAIGAON PS-BONGAIGAON DISTBONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-783380 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM.
2:PARAMESWAR BORO S/O -LT. FULEN BORO R/O- DABOLIGAON P.SKAJALGAON DIST-CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM PIN- 783386 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A K AZAD, MR. I HUSSAIN,MR A K KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
O R D E R
Date : 26.02.2026.
Heard Mr. A.K. Azad, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing on behalf of the State respondent No. 1. During the deliberation of the case, Mr. Azad, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that there are some formal defects in the cause title of the petition, for which he wants to withdraw the same with a liberty to file afresh. Mr. Borthakur, the learned Addl. P.P., Assam raised no objection to that regard. Prayer is allowed. Let the present criminal petition be disposed of on withdrawal with a liberty to file afresh, if so advised.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant