IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 319 RANBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Deepak Bha ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that the issue involved in this case is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in of Haryana and others’, 2. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of in the same terms as the judgment in the case of 3. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 10.02.2026 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11860 DATE OF DECISION: RANBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana for HSVP. ***** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that the issue involved in this case is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in CWP-16389-2025 titled as ‘ of Haryana and others’, decided on 22.12.2025. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of in the same terms as the judgment in the case of Ram Lal Mahendru (supra). All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand (ANUPINDER SINGH (DEEPAK MANCHANDA Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 11860-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 10.02.2026 … Petitioner (s) ... Respondent(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL DEEPAK MANCHANDA Advocate for the petitioners. A.G., Haryana for HSVP. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that the issue involved in this case is squarely covered by the 2025 titled as ‘Ram Lal Mahendru Vs. State In view of the above, the petition is disposed of in the same terms as the (supra). All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that the issue involved in this case is squarely covered by the Ram Lal Mahendru Vs. State In view of the above, the petition is disposed of in the same terms as the All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand SWARNJIT SINGH 2026.02.11 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document