Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
08.04.2026 Court No.35. D/L.18. Rakib (Rejected)
CRM (M) 392 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Raiganj Police Station case no. 1050 of 2025 dated 14.09.2025 under Sections 316(5)/138(4)/336(3)/340(2)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Sections 12/13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act,
1988.
And
In the matter of : Debdeep Bhattacharjee.
……Petitioner. Mr. Jayanta Narayan Chatterjee, Sr. Adv, Ms. Moumita Pandit Ms. Ritushree Banerjee
.....for the Petitioner. Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, Ld. APP Mr. Sachit Talukdar
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 204 days. The case is based on documents, search and seizure is completed, charge-sheet has been submitted before the jurisdictional Court and charges have been framed as also the fact that the petitioner is a physically challenged person. As such he may be granted bail on any stringent conditions. Learned advocate for the State produces the Case Diary which reflects that money was transmitted from the account of the District Magistrate to that of the petitioner and the said money is of
“District Anaemia Control Account”. According to the prosecution case a sum of Rs.2.21/- crores along with a sum of Rs.26/- lakh were traced in the account of the present petitioner.
2 Having considered the gravity of the offence, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, CRM (M) 392 of 2026 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)