APHC010613922025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 19th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3503/2025 Between: 1. N. VENKATA KRISHNA VARMA, S/O. NADIMPALLI SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGE 55 YEARS ,68-10-20/4,VIDYUT NAGAR, KAKINADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI N V V SATYANARAYANA, COMMISSIONER KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA KAKINADA DISTRICT. R 1 CAUSE TITLE AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 27.02.2026, VIDE IA NO-1/2025 IN CC NO 3503OF 2025 2. SRI S MASTYARAJU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 3. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 11.08.2025 of this Honble Court made in WP. No.20900/2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Amend the Cause Title in the present Contempt case by Deleting the Respondent No.1 Sri S Sachidananda Varma (S S Varma), Commissioner, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada District and Amend Respondent 1 as Sri N VV Satyanarayana, Commissioner, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada in the above C.C.No.3500 of 2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. M Krishna Rao SC for skl vzm kkd Municipal Corporations The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.3503 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.20900 of 2025, dated 11.08.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM 97 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.3503 of 2025 Date: 19.08.2026 KGM