Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 80181 (MAD)

M.SELLAMUTHU v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/50210/2025 · 2026-01-05

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 50210 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 50210 of 2025 M.Sellamuthu Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Office Of The District, Collector, Kalalkurichi, Kallakurichi District 2.The District Revenue Officer District Revenue Officer, Kalalkurichi, Kallakurichi District 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office, Kalalkurichi, Kallakurichi District 4.The Tashildar Tashildar Office, Chinnasalem 606 201 5.Murugu Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing Respondents 1 to 4 to remove the name of Murugu, W/o sivanthan form survey no 229/2A (7.41 cent), North Kattu Kottai, Thottapadi (P.o), Chinnasekaran (T.K) allakurichi Distrct in the computer patta and the computed A Register, where her name has been erroneously included I humbly pray that the baove erroneous entry be removed. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50210 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.P. Elango For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For R1 To R4 ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to remove the name of the fifth respondent in the patta for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. 2.According to the petitioner, an erroneous entry has been made in the patta by including the name of the fifth respondent for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner has given a representation to the official respondents to remove the name of the fifth respondent in the patta. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3.Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. He would submit on instructions that the official respondents have considered the petitioner’s representation and they are in the process of passing final orders, rejecting the petitioner’s representation since according to the official respondents, a valid patta has been issued in favour of the fifth respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50210 of 2025 4.In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents, on instructions, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the fourth respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation seeking for removal of the name of the fifth respondent in the patta for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 05-01-2026 vga To 1.The District Collector Office Of The District, Collector, Kalalkurichi, Kallakurichi District 2.The District Revenue Officer District Revenue Officer, Kalalkurichi, Kallakurichi District 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office, Kalalkurichi, Kallakurichi District 4.The Tashildar Tashildar Office, Chinnasalem 606 201 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50210 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. vga WP No. 50210 of 2025 05-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis