Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 80177 (MAD)

B.VISWANTHAN v. THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WP/49201/2025 · 2026-01-02

P T Asha

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.49201 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No.49201 of 2025 B.Viswanthan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Additional Principal Secretary Department Of Housing And Urban Development, St. George Fort, Chennai. 2.Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board Rep By The Managing Director No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-5. ...Respondents Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, Directing the 1st respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.04.2025 for allotment of tenement in the Pattinapakkam scheme. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sivakumar For Respondents : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, Spl GP for R.1 : Mr.G.Venkatesan, for R.2. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.49201 of 2025 O R D E R This writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- “Directing the 1st respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.04.2025 for allotment of tenement in the Pattinapakkam scheme.” 2. The petitioner’s case is that he belongs to the fisherman community and is residing in the Marina Beach area. He does not own any house or land either in his name or in the name of his spouse. Further, neither the petitioner nor his family members were allotted any tenement under the Tsunami Rehabilitation Scheme. Therefore, he had applied for allotment of a tenement in the Pattinapakkam scheme before the 2nd respondent Board. However, no action was taken on the said application. Consequently, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 26.04.2025 to the 1st respondent. To date, the said representation has not been considered. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the records. 4. Considering the limited request of the petitioner and taking note of the fact the petitioner’s representation dated 26.04.2025 has not been 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.49201 of 2025 considered to date, the Writ Petition is allowed. The 1st respondent is directed to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 26.04.2025 and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 02.01.2026 (shr) Index : Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No To 1.The Additional Principal Secretary Department Of Housing And Urban Development, St. George Fort, Chennai. 2.Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board Rep By The Managing Director No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-5. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.49201 of 2025 P.T. ASHA . J., (shr) W.P.No.49201 of 2025 02.01.2026 (4/5) 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis