Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 80160 (MAD)

Dhanasekaran v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

/35221/2025 · 2026-01-02

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.35221 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.35221 of 2025 1. G.Dhanasekaran 2. K.Balamurugan ... Petitioners Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Kilyanoor Police Station, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District. Crime No.335 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.335 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr. Tamil Selvan For Respondent : M/s. J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal Side) O R D E R The petitioners herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of BNS read with 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.35221 of 2025 Section 21(1) of Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act 1957 in Crime No.335 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioners is that these petitioners illegally quarrying and transporting 36 Metric tons of sand in two tipper lorries and on seeing the Competent Officers, the petitioners stopped the vehicle and ran away from there. Hence, the case. 3.This Court earlier dismissed the petitioners’anticipatory bail on 20.11.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.31654 of 2025 by stating the following reasons: Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this petitioners is illegally quarried 36 Metric tons of sand in two tipper lorries and also damaged the ecology and, if the anticipatory bail is granted, he will indulge in similar activities, hence this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Now, without any change in circumstances, the present petition has been filed. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.35221 of 2025 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. 02.01.2026 sma 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.35221 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR, J. sma To 1.The Inspector of Police, Kilyanoor Police Station, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Crl.O.P.No.35221 of 2025 02.01.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis