1 2026:CGHC:9832 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2034 of 2026 Manbodhi Ram Sahu S/o Mahetaru Ram Sahu Aged About 68 Years Resident Of Village- Kasdol Rice Mill Road, Near Jagannath Petrol Pump Police Station Kasdol District- Baloda Bazar (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh The Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department Atal Nagar District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Urban Administration And Development Department Atal Nagar District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Directorate Urban Administration And Development Department Atal Nagar Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Joint Director Directorate Urban Administration And Development Department Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) 5 - The Collector Balod District- Balod (C.G.) 6 - President Nagar Panchayat Gunderdehi District- Balod (C.G.) 7 - Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Panchayat Gundedehi District- Balod (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Ranjana Jaiswal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Diksha Gouraha, Dy. G.A. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PARTH PRATEEM SAHU) Order on Board 25/02/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs: 2 “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to pay his money Rs. 80,864/-” 10.2 Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner while working on the post of Assistant Revenue Inspector retired from service on 30.04.2020. During his period of service, some of the dues were not paid to the petitioner, for which he made several requests and thereafter had submitted representation before the authority lastly on 21.07.2025 which till date is pending consideration and, therefore, direction be issued to respondent No. 7 to take decision on the representation submitted by the petitioner at the earliest, within specified time frame. 3. Counsel for the state submits that the relief as sought for is against respondent No. 7, for whom she is not appearing. 4. Considering the nature of grievance as raised and further submissions that the representation is still pending consideration, writ petition, at this stage is disposed of without noticing the respondent No. 7, directing him to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of four months from the date of receipt of the order. Petitioner will be at liberty to submit fresh representation if he so desire and if such a representation is submitted, the said representation shall also be considered and decided along with the pending representation. 5. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) JUDGE Saurabh