Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010094582026 2026:GAU-AS:8398 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1413/2026 MAHDUJ HUSSAIN SIRAJ ALIAS RUBAL S/O RAFIQUL HUSSAIN ALIAS ABDUL RAFIQUE VILL. TATIKATA PATHAR P.O. AND P.S. MOIRABARI DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN 782126 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR HARUN ALL RASHID Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 12-06-2026 Heard Mr. A.A. Dewan, the learned counsel appearing for the accused- applicant. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor Page No.# 2/3 for the State. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for grant of bail to the accused-applicant in connection with Moirabari Police Station Case No. 46/2026, corresponding to G.R. No. 422/2026, under Sections 190/191(2)/118(1)/329(4)/310(2)/74/109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. An FIR was lodged on 07.05.2026 by one Sahanaj Begum, the informant, alleging that the named persons in the FIR came to their house by trespassing into their premises on 06.05.2026 at 8:00 PM armed with several wooden batons etc. and thereafter, attacked the household members of the informant, whereby some of the family members of the informant got injured. 4. On receipt of the FIR, the police registered the Moirabari Police Station Case No. 46/2026 under the aforementioned sections. 5. Mr. A.A. Dewan, the learned counsel appearing for the accused-applicant submits that certain pre-existing issues were there between the parties and quarrel took place between the family members of the informant and the accused-applicant and others, however, no serious injury was caused during such tussle. He submits that the accused-applicant is already behind the bars for last 28 (Twenty Eight) days and further custodial detention may not be required in the instant case. 6. The Case Diary in the instant case has been produced and the same is perused. Page No.# 3/3 7. Mr. R.J. Baruah, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submits that the family members of the informant got some injuries which are not of serious nature. However, he opposes the bail prayer of the accused- applicant at this stage. 8. This Court after hearing the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties and taking into account the whole aspects of the matter, is of the considered opinion that the accused-applicant should be granted bail at this stage. Accordingly, it is directed that the accused-applicant shall be released from jail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with a suitable surety of like nature to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Morigaon, subject to the conditions that :- The accused-applicant shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the Investigating Authority. 9. In the above terms, the instant Bail Application is disposed of. 10. Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant