Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8012 (JHR)

SAMIM ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2756/2026 · 2026-04-30

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:12927 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2756 of 2026 Samim Ansari, Son of Suleman Mian … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Advocate --- 03/30th April 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 12/2026 for the offence registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of BNS and Section 66B, 66C, 66D, 84(C) of the I.T. Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that two mobile phones and two SIM cards are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, and only one victim could be identified. He submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.01.2026, having no criminal antecedents, and the charge-sheet has already been submitted. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the prayer for bail. However, he does not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. He has submitted that altogether 97 crime links have been found, but the fact remains that only one victim could be identified. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted and that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2026:JHHC:12927 2 satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 12/2026, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 30.04.2026 Uploaded On: Mukul/-