VIKRAM MEENA @ VIRENDRA MEENA S/O DILIP MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7666/2026 · 2026-05-25
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8008 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8008 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:22055] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7666/2026 Vikram Meena @ Virendra Meena S/o Dilip Meena, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Hadiya, Police Station Mahuwa, District Dausa At Present House No. 24, Shyam Nagar Purana Bagrana, Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur East (Raj.) (At Present Confined At Sub Jail Weir). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 25/05/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.8/2026 registered at Police Station Kherli Mod, District Bharatpur for offences under Section 303(2) of BNS,
2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the present petitioner is that he stole the motorcycle of the complainant Ransingh. Petitioner is behind the bars since 28.01.2026 though 20 cases have been reported against him, however, in all the cases he is already bailed out. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose
[2026:RJ-JP:22055] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7666/2026] would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Vikram Meena @ Virendra Meena S/o Dilip Meena, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Kherli Mod, District Bharatpur in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is
directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for
[2026:RJ-JP:22055] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7666/2026] learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/64