[2026:JHHC:12711] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2149 of 2026 1. Tushar Bahadur, Son of Motu Bahadur, aged about 21 years, resident of Ranidih, Gultu, Jhopal, P.O. and P.S. Bagbera, Town Jamshedpur, District- Eastsinghbhum. 2. Kunal Sahu, son of Narsingh Sahu, aged about 22 years, resident of H. No. 73, Near Hanuman Mandir, Jagdishpur Road Harharguttu Bazar, P.O. Harharguttu, P.S. Harharguttu, District-East Singhbhum. 3. Dinesh Ram Sahu Son of Arjun Ram Sau age about 28 years Residents of Bagbera, CP Tola, Ranidih, P.O. and P.S. Bagbera, Town Jamshedpur, District-East Singbhum. ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Mayank Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 30.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bagbera P.S. Case No. 137 of 2024, registered for the offences under Sections 109, 115(2), 117(2), 126(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the altercation took place between the petitioners and the informant side in the puja pandal. He next submits that the allegation of assault is against all the accused persons and it is not clear that the injury has been received by the informant pursuant to whose blow. He further [2026:JHHC:12711] -2- submits that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-17 of the petition. He also submits that six of the similarly situated co-accused have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 7303 of 2025 by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegation of assault is there against all the accused persons. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons of making assault, however, it is not clear that from whose blow the injury has been received by the informant and further the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-17 of the petition and six of the similarly situated co- accused have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in the aforementioned A.B.A., I am inclined to provide privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned court within four weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur, in connection with Bagbera P.S. Case No. 137 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-30.04.2026 Amitesh/-