Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 80038 (MAD)

S.Vairaprakasam v. Vedhanayagi

CONT P/128/2026 · 2026-02-27

C Saravanan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CONT P No. 128 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN CONT P No. 128 of 2026 S.Vairaprakasam S/o.SriniappaNadar, Rep by his Power Agent, Mr.S.Jaffer Hussain, S/o.Sabarbasha, No.16, Thiruveelakanda Nagar 3rd Part, Kavangarai, Puzhal, chennai 600066 Now Presently resididng at No.14, Moorthy Nagar, Kathirvedu, Chennai 600 066. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Vedhanayagi, The Block Development Officer, Puzhal Panchayat Union, Puzhal, Chennai 600 066. ..Contemnor(s) Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.8388/2013 dated 28.06.2022. For Petitioner(s): M/s. K.Karthick Jothi For Contemnor(s): Mr.S.Senthil Murugan, Special Government Pleader https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 128 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER Heard Mr.K.karthick Jothi, the learned counsel for the petitioner and S.Senthil Murugan, the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent. 2. The petitioner has filed this Contempt Petition as against the wilful disobedience of the order by the Respondent / Contemnor dated 28.06.2022 of this Court in W.P.No.8388 of 2013. 3. The respondent has filed an Affidavit reporting compliance of the order dated 28.06.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.8388 of 2013. They have also filed typed set of papers of the Revenue records, Survey Report and map of the subject property along with a sketch indicating where the encroachments were made by the respondent and that the date on which the encroachments made by the respondent were removed from the subject property. 4. It is submitted by the learned Special Government Pleader that as far as the building that is existing in the land is concerned, it is the subject matter for a private dispute of the petitioner and that the respondents have no authority to demolish the same. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 128 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. The submission of the learned Special Government Pleader appears to be reasonable. Therefore, this Court is inclined to close this Contempt Petition. 6. Accordingly this Contempt Petition is closed. However, the petitioner is granted with liberty to take steps in accordance with law for removing the encroachment by private parties on the petitioner’s land. 27-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No BKN To: Vedhanayagi, The Block Development Officer, Puzhal Panchayat Union, Puzhal, Chennai 600 066. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 128 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.SARAVANAN, J. BKN CONT P No. 128 of 2026 27-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis