Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8003 (ORI)

BIBEKANANDA BEHERA v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/10841/2026 · 2026-05-01

Chittaranjan Dash

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.10841 of 2026 Bibekananda Behera …. Petitioner Mr. A. Nayak, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Party Mr. S.K. Jee, AGA Mr. P. Behera, SC (for O.P. No.2) CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 01.05.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 2. By means of this application, the Petitioner seeks the following relief:- “It is therefore prayed that in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstance the Hon'ble may be pleased to admit the writ petition issue rule nisi calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to; i) why the RCs of the vehicles, as per the list Submitted by the petitioner, shall not be cancelled. ii) Why any other order(s)/direction(s) as this hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper shall not be passed. If the opposite parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause then the Hon'ble court may be pleased to make the Rule absolute and be further pleased to pass appropriate writs in the nature of mandamus or any other writ(s)/direction(s) to the opposite parties to cancel the Registration of the said vehicles as per the application and list submitted vide Annexure- to secure the ends ofjustice. And/or pass any other order(s)/direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to secure the ends of justice. And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound.” p. 2 3. Mr. Behera, learned counsel appearing for the Transport Commissioner i.e. Opp. Party No.2 submits that pursuant to the circular issued by the Government, the action followed, by which the present Petitioner is aggrieved herein. 4. The circular having been withdrawn in the meanwhile, the Petitioner may make an application in accordance with law before the appropriate authority for consideration. 5. In view of the above submission of the learned Panel Counsel, the Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ application, with liberty to make an application, as required under law, for redressal of his grievance. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge Sipra Designation: Senior Stenographer