RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/306/2026 · 2026-01-06
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 80 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 80 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.306 of 2026
Decided on: 6th January, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajesh Kumar and others
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and another
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
3.
Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations dated 08.12.2025 (Annexure P-1 Colly.) seeking applicability of Ghanshyam Dass and others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others2 have not
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 CWP No.2056 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024
2 been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
4.
Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners dated 08.12.2025 (Annexure P-1 Colly.) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Ghanshyam Dass2 within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 06, 2026
Judge Mukesh