Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7998 (DEL)

VIKRAM SINGH AND ANR v. GOVT OFNCTOFDELHI AND ORS

CRL.M.C./1745/2026 · 2026-03-11

Saurabh Banerjee

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1745/2026, CRL.M.A. 7133/2026-Exp VIKRAM SINGH AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kartikay Mishra, Mr. Shubham Mishra, Mr. Shanker and Mr. Ratnesh Srivastava, Advocates. Petitioners in person. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocate. SI Anand Swaroop, PS-DIU/ North Delhi. Respondent nos.2, 3 & 4 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 11.03.2026 1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.283/2017 dated 15.07.2017 registered at PS.: Shalimar Bagh, Delhi under Sections 323/451/427/379/356/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Compromise/ Settlement Deed dated 14.01.2026, arrived at between the petitioners and the private respondents, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identities. 2. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 12:43:20 that though he has no objection to quashing of the FIR, however, since the entire State machinery was put in motion, he prays for imposing some costs on the private parties. 3. Respondent nos.2, 3 & 4, who are present in Court, also accept notice and affirmed the terms of the aforesaid Settlement Deed and have no objection to the quashing of the present FIR. 4. The petitioners and the respondent nos.2, 3 & 4 as well as their credentials, as on record, have been identified by the IO. 5. De hors the allegations and the sections involved, since the petitioners and respondent nos.2, 3 and 4 have settled the matter qua which they have also filed accompanying affidavit(s) herein, and the parties shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions thereof, as also following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr. (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2014) 6 SCC 466, this Court is of the considered opinion that continuation of the aforesaid FIR against the petitioners will be an exercise in futility. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.283/2017 dated 15.07.2017 registered at PS.: Shalimar Bagh, Delhi under Sections 323/451/427/379/356/34 of the IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. 7. Lastly, the petitioners as well as respondent nos. 2 to 4 as a gesture of goodwill volunteers to distribute snacks and cold drink items to student of class 1st to 5th of the Primary School, Haider Pur, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi (Principal Name: Mrs. Manila Verma, Mob no.8130568538) on 12th This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 12:43:20 March, 2026 at 08:15 A.M., the cost which shall be split by each of the aforesaid parties equally. 8. As such, the present petition, along with the pending applications, is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J. MARCH 11, 2026/NA This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 12:43:20