Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7997 (CHH)

Smt. Bindulata Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

WPS/5107/2019 · 2026-02-03

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6341 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5107 of 2019 Smt. Bindulata Sahu W/o Shri Krishna Kumar Sahu Aged About 30 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Fingeshwar, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, R/o New Teachers Colony, Fingeshwar Tahsil Rajim District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - District Education Officer Gariyaband District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Abhanpur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Fingeshwar District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 5 - Block Education Officer Abhanpur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Ms. Apoorva Pandey, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Amit Buxy, Dy. Govt. Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 04.02.2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that impugned order dated 10.06.2019 (Annexure-P/01), which is challenged in this writ petition, is an internal communication issued by the CEO, SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 Janpad Panchayat, Abhanpur to the Block Education officer, Abhanpur, District Raipur. However, at present, nothing adverse has been done against the petitioner, therefore, she may be granted liberty to pursue the remedy once any action is taken against her. 2. The prayer is fair and reasonable and it is not opposed by the other side. 3. In that view of the matter, all the writ petitions are disposed of with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioners that as and when any adverse action is taken against her, she may question the same, in accordance with law. No order as to cost. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if