COCP-1240 IN THE HI 218 Surinder Sin Rajesh Kum CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. record. 2. violation of Bench of th State of Pun a petition u (Regulation) Collector, co 3. State submit P-1), respon 1240-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o er Singh Garewal @ Surinder Singh Versus Kumar and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Proxy counsel for Ms. Kanwal S. Walia, Advocate Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Vivek Chavhan, Advocate f I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Vakalatnama filed on behalf of The present contempt petitio on of order dated 04.03.2025 (Annexu of this Court in CWP-34760-2024 Punjab and others’; whereby the res ition under Section 7 of the Punj lation) Act, 1961 (for short-‘the tor, concerned. At the very outset, learned co ubmits that in compliance of the order respondent No. 2-Sarpanch of village ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1240-2026 Date of Decision: 05.05.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA vocate for the petitioner. AAG, Punjab ocate for respondent No. 2. half of respondent No. 2 is taken on petition has been filed alleging nnexure P-1) passed by a Division 2024, titled as ‘Surinder Singh vs. respondents were directed to file Punjab Village Common Lands ‘the Act’) before the Assistant ned counsel for respondent No. 1- e order dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure village Alamgir, District Ludhiana n on ging sion vs. file ands tant e iana RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1240 has duly file such, nothing 4. taken on rec the petitione 5. 6. required to b of, according 7. 8. 05.05.2026 rishu 1240-2026 -2- ly filed the petition under Section 7 o nothing survives in the present petition Copy of petition dated 11.03.2 on record. A copy thereof, has been su titioner. Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ion 7 of the Act on 11.03.2026. As etition. 1.03.2026 handed over in Court is been supplied to learned counsel for above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No As rt is l for are sed RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.